In this section are reported all those theories that represent in the fields of  science and research a substantial innovation. Discoveries, data, and theories that today  do not find a "logical" collocation in the rational framework of the present scientific model of our world and that  perhaps represent the frontier of a wider way to understand the essence on which the universe is really based.  

…. The whole of nature, in its wider meaning, with all the biotic and non-biotic components is in effect, in extreme synthesis, a thermodynamic whole, a whole where every part, every monad, contributes to using the available energy of matter in the best way, to using the potentiality of  matter.  

This complex and, at first sight, incomprehensible variability, difference, allows the maximum exploitation of "fuel matter", raising to the possible limit its energy output. This first aspect can only lead to one consideration: in this Grand Design, the Designer has taken care not to waste anything of his tangible creation; he has taken care not to under-use  even a  single electron of it; worried; "God does not play  dice with the world" (A. Einstein).  

To understand these affirmations better we can make some examples which take their cue from simple thermodynamic concepts, from nature, from the world:  

1. we can compare the environment to a whole constituted by elementary cells (monads), each of which possesses its own definable energy level which is in continuous evolution and in continuous contact (interchange) with other cells.  

2. every monad is in turn composed by a series of components (organisms, energy resources, etc.) which inside it have the function of raising the overall energy output.  

3. every monad is therefore a system (a whole) which is able to draw the maximum energy from the total matter of which it is composed.  

4. in nature the development of energy proceeds therefore with the maximum output and low quantities of entropy, that is, of wasted energy.  

Through the use of the modern terminology, we can say that in nature everything proceeds with the "method" of  clean energy, where the concept of clean  is obviously referable to the obtainable maximum output, and to the consequent low production of by-products of the reactions, of waste.  

It appears evident then that the production of energy is obtainable or through the  "clean" method, regulated by the natural system, or through alternative methods, which the more different they are form these, the dirtier they will be.  

It is therefore easy enough to understand how every form of "pollution" is nothing but a bad management of matter; a "bad" knowledge of the potentiality of this which, to produce better, must be organized  as it is  in the natural system; it has  to become different  and wisely organized.

In short, we are able to write the following relationship: where S is the entropy produced in a  cycle which is different to the natural one and s  is the one coming from natural systems.

S will evidently tend to be ever greater or, at least, equal to s, and the following equation  represents the ability to "pollute" of a thermodynamic system, as opposed to natural systems or ecosystems.  

S - s ³ 0 

For simplicity, let’s call this function I.

This function that we call pollution represents therefore  a bad, or if we want, imperfect, not optimal, use of the energy potential of matter. The pollution represents, therefore, a function of the most greatest entropies produced by  systems which are "distant" from those developed in nature and derived therefore from its organizational logic.

We have given a definition of pollution, if this be allowed, which not only is  technical , but also metaphysical. The more man tries understand and therefore to imitate the logic of  nature, the more he will harmonize himself with the evolutionary tendency of the universe, with its inexorable progress.

The more man  understands this design,  the closer he will be to the desire of the Creator of the world, not only from a philosophical point of view, but also from a practical one. We have arrived therefore at a rational definition (please forgive my extreme summary) of the concepts of clean or good energy and dirty or bad energy; the concept of pollution as a product of man’s bad knowledge and use of  the things which have been created. 

Physical pollution as a  tangible reality of  metaphysical pollution. The dirty conscience…. 

taken from the book: Dalla materia al Padre (from matter to the  Father)

by Guido Bissanti  

published by Mario Grispo Editore